Internatiomal Relations Foreign Policy Essay

IntroductionThe US Foreign constitution is uncontroversial going spheric, be it in the Far East, Middle East and the Asia pacific Regions. The political sciences of the public argon inherent with the same positions and policies in various aspects that de none to governmental and economic earnest. On the other hand, the so-called insurance indemnity in achieving gentle hostage varies in degrees of considerations under the constitutions of contrary countries.As the realism watch and perseveres to achieving human order and peace, the cl disclose and competition among strong commonwealths ar at large. The stigma of timidityistic round off on US soil has blossom the slogan to end up the co contenddice and treacherous act of terror of Bin Laden and its cohorts.Way back in the 60s and 70s, the same sloganeering of strange constitution to fightds strategicalal surety have echoed in the corridors of S prohibitedh East Asia, as the Vietnam War squander thousands o f the Statesn soldiers lives. As there was the saying goes on dont fight your enemy in their own backyard.What has most recently substantial in the turn of 21st century is the strategic positioning of contradictory policy as changing of the guards in allied governments progressively hold or inclined to adopting a policy of powerful nations.The magnitude of invite, motif and clout is in the frontline of global competition in the context of socio-economic, political and social development. More so, impertinent policies bring forth and reach out diplomatic ties among allies as crossing borders widens and broadens powers that be. Policy on mankind OrderThe Preemptive or preventive measures particularly on war on terrorism rooted out by 9/11 attack on US soil. The cost of the Statesn lives outlived many agonies far reaching places of the World. The war on terrorism has plagued the knowledge base order. Supported by US Congress and the UN, chairwoman Bush out cried the rage and t ake of war in Middle East. Economic embargo have close to the most outrageous assault coupled with advanced technological equipping and soldiers troops.At the height of massive legislation of policy, advocacy and force campaigns against terrorism to surviving demesne order, civil wars and domestic violence rushing in other countries. F poweriveening bonk on manufacturing of weapons of mass destructions has dubbed the conglutination Korea, aside from known fractured pile of lethal weaponry in Iraq and Afghanistan. non remote to that is the continuing reign of terror of Islamic secessionist in Asia ilk Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.Mean succession, in the Philippines, the government have pledged its allied support to combating and decimate substantial terrorist groups and potential enemies of the state. The dreaded Islamic secessionist Abu Sayyaf terrorist group in the Confederate Philippines embarked on the first blow.The show of force and deployment of the Sta tesn troops in the Philippines war zones through the OPLAN Balikatan (linking shoulder) of the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) which plays critical role to the Philippines arm forces. This manifests domestic slaying of unlike policy in military personal matters. It cited, though, that foreign policy imposition on domestic affairs of Philippine fortify forces is impartial, ever since the OPLAN Balikatan specifically implements totally combat exercises in unfamiliar war zones or combat territories.The call of the fall in States to all of its allied countries and governments of the world is adhere on a policy of surviving and preserving the world order. Thus, the US foreign policy stands on the fundamentals of inter subject stability. discipline security preemptive or preventive war strategy?The source of terce world countries in achieving national security is imitate with the Protect the States bout Of 2007. In which it amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance bear (FI SA) to provide intelligence operation community essential tools to acquire valuable culture or so terrorists who want to harm America. (www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/nationalsecurity/) This follows the deliverance of US President George W. Bush on 10th October 2007In August, Congress passed the Protect America action, a bill to modernize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. This unused rightfulness strengthened our ability to collect foreign intelligence on terrorists overseas, and it closed a dangerous gap in our intelligence. Since this important measure took effect, our intelligence professionals have been able to gather critical schooling that would have been missed without this authority. And keeping this authority is essential to keeping America safe. Exchange of culture in the parlance of clandestine sourcing involves method or techniques of achieving the so-called intelligence network. Whereas, nations or countries and even communities that sh ars the sa me information in order to preempt, prevent, circumvent a potential enemy attack or heist that posture the state and its citizenry into woes and chaos be considered to be one in the intelligence community. The community has envelopes the security of the nation that spends the cost of peaceful livelihood by way of ensuring and securing politically, economically and socially. capitalist economy free wiliness or imperialism?Free trade is a increment issue of critical importance particularly to the third world economies. equal in the Philippines, the so-called global competitiveness is over dependent on the efficiency of agriculture and the development of industries in the rural areas. It meant to be, as the go around markets freely soar into sky-high pricing and inflation, the US and European markets are the major stakeholders and consumers. However, the quality and production standards are the sharp end in order to compete globally. The General Agreement on obligation and m ess (GATT) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1994. The WTO conducted negotiations through the Uruguay circuit from September 1986 to April 1994 in Punta del Este, Uruguay. The main objectives of the Uruguay Round, according to WTO, were to reduce awkward subsidies to put restrictions on foreign investment and to begin the process of opening trade in services like banking and insurance (WTO).With the most recent gathering (round of talks) in June 2007, negotiations within the Doha round broke down at a conference in Potsdam, New York, a major tie-up occurred between the US, the EU, India and Brazil. The main disagreement was over opening up agricultural and industrial markets in various countries and also how to cut rich nation farm subsidies.Among the countries in South East, like the Philippines, exporting of raw materials is a major breakthrough to compete in the open market and trade. alone the setback relies on achieving the quota on export volume as provided in GATT. The efficiency of production of the Philippine agriculture does not mainly swear on the efficient hardship of the farmers and other sectors in fishery and livestock.Therefore, while a third world sphere is unable to compete and finish its stake in the open market, the means and least it piece of tail issue forth is the surplus technology in post-harvest equipment, manufacturing, food processing and the exploits of cheap tire out force.Capitalism has long been embedded in the history of monarchies, empires and dynasties. The ploys to developing the so-called bowl of economy have been brought about by war, famine, embargo and GATT. The capitalists countries pour out on investments to producing raw materials which the 21st century method calls it as out-sourcing or outbound. The out-sourcing or sourcing out is holistic as it invests directly in labor and raw materials. The greatest leap is to amass the power and shed of governments or bureaucracy. Democracy continuities and contradictions. The popular democracy and democratic reform amongst governments are but a manifestation of battalions main(a) and inherent rights. Democracy is basically upholding the granting immunity of will and expression where the happen of practice of law applies. Democracy sometime becomes the scapegoat of hostility where common people are compromised.The US war on terrorism, as outlined in its guinea pig credentials Strategy of 2006 (NSS 2006), merely defines the democratic will to uphold a just and peaceful state. Meaning to uphold the rule of law, preserve the peoples sovereignty, and secure the state and its citizenry from external and intimate at loggerheads forces. Again the 9/11 incident have broadened the US National Strategy of 2006 to cross borders as it reached out attack in Afghanistan and Iraq. Meanwhile, the facades of military force have shown in selective countries of the world in direct of terrorists.Over the past historic period aft(prenominal) September 11th 2001, the world has witnessed the sword of Damocles unleashed in Middle East and countries in Latin America and South East Asia. The common understanding of allied countries to the US claims paroxysm of human security and protecting democracies.It may be presumed with etymology that democracy is dependent to chaos or tyranny. The societal comprehension of having democracy is attained after a long dictatorial regime has reigned to power. In the Philippines, the 20-year old rule of the Marcos dictatorship has ended through a military-civilian-back revolt in 1986. The income tax return of the so-called popular democracy have been labeled or seconded from the popular will of the Filipinos as the non-violent response dismantling the regime.Democracy can be also defined as to representing the collective and major stronghold of a sovereign people. People as it mean humans. Therefore, democracy is people, humanity and sovereign will. World peace contrib uting or detracting?World peace is every(prenominal) mans dream and every nations hope. The proficiency of world peace can be perceived by attaining a world order. The world order where every nation has resolutely achieved the shopping mall of democracy based on just and lasting peace. A government enjoys the fundamentals of peaceful co-existence with its people. The rule of law harnesses the execution of justice. The abundance of life does not show in the streets where vagabonds and beggars dwell. The ecology returns its greens and life of the natural state from extinction. Thus, world peace shall be harmoniously shared among nations.As the joined Nations (UN) calls on the world order in accord of achieving world peace, the US foreign policy, unneurotic with its strategic security programs, remains as a predominating entity with the so-called vacuum of power. The continuing effort of the United Nations to halt global hostilities, the domestic conflict and foreign aggression ha ve transformed into different level.The US foreign policy has an overarching policy framework that comprehends the fundamental factors influence our world, in practice, foreign policy typically is local. In other words, foreign policy is not designed to deal with different forces separately or on a global scale, but rather with how they come together and interact to create concrete problems or opportunities in specific regions and countries (Richard N. Haas, create article Policymakers and the Intelligence Community Supporting Us Foreign Policy in the Post-9/11 World, CIA posted document).It can be interpreted at a laymans understanding that the US foreign policy has a leverage to be dealt with or not. At a glance, the influence of foreign policy in the domestic political and economic affairs of a country can be superficial. It is for that particular country to be anointed with a foreign policy guideline to interact on its implementation or pattern its governmental functions. In o ther words, a country that adheres and implements the foreign policy complicates the fundamentals of its governance as well as the political will, economic condition and above all the lives of people.To which, the third world countries in general are in fragile condition as benefactors of foreign policy, the disarray in governmental functions and helplessness for empowerment are alone fractions of cumulative result.The avenues to achieving world peace with the continuing proliferation of a foreign policy in variable methods, situations and functions of people and government is a highway to a long walk home. Human rights helping or ache?It says that the essence of becoming a man is being human. Human right is the preservation and self-respect of life, liberty, the freedom of thought and expression, the equality before the law.As the war on terrorism escalates, a large number of casualties and refugees hold to grow. Starvation is a result of dislocation from economic source or a bsence of food supply by economic embargo. Those are only a few result of sub-human condition in a world at war although some experts would refer to ethical parameters but fluid the essence of being human have denied.The Human Security Act in the Philippines have been legislated and on its infantile enforcement. The clout of enforcement have been claimed by defiant civil society groups in the Philippines as experimental and patterned to US National Security Strategy of 2006. According to reports, a shell scenario of human rights violations has risen and growing from approximate 8-10 percent in years 2006 and 2007 breaking the similar reported cases at the time of martial law from 1973 to 1986 during the Marcos government (Philippines, relegation on Human Rights).With the clout of foreign policy in the third world countries, collateral damage in the causa of the world order took place in small and starving populace. spell made disasters equals its fury to natural calamities. As though, foreign policy may not mean or intend to harm the steward of the land, the complicating effect settles its residue on the stewardship. This means the system of execution becomes hurting to the spunk of the society that represents community, people, family and humans.III. Conclusion A thorough review on forthcoming source or reference concludes that foreign policy influences much on the context of political, economic and social function of people and its government. The reaching out to influence external or domestic affairs of allied governments is supporter and certain to interpretation, studies and value assessment on impact to particular governance.The sympathy, cooperation, collaborationism are among the vital faculties which the foreign policy inculcate among ally countries. The strategic positioning towards world domination is to win over supporters and the like in a rallying point of waging war on terrorist. The disturbing issue on human security, aside from acqu iring a strategic security measure or preemptive response against terrorism, make a distinction to the latter. However, a common understanding to safeguard the lives and post of innocent people reconcile the distinction between human security and strategic security measure against terrorism.In retrospect, the effects of US foreign policy to the third world politics and economy can be implied as a domestic affair or patronage at the point of view of direct control or internal aggression over governance. What can be safely question is the luculent application of a foreign policy in an unspecified territory, device characteristic in governance of an allied government, the politico-economic and politico-military condition.The magnitude of US foreign policy is characterized by its dominance towards world order. However, the resistance and defiance among other powerful nations implicates competition resulting to conflicts, political and economic sabotage. This becomes an alarming situ ation that threatens the life and dignity of men, women and children, as well as the economic base.A critical perception and analyses on US foreign policy can be much effectively attained deducing the roles and executions of allied countries. The criticism on influencing the governance and code of an allied country that patronize the foreign policy is an issue at large. As critics of US global domination should pause and consider the alternative. If the United States retreats from its hegemonic role, who would supplant it? Not Europe, not China, not the Muslim Worldand surely not the United Nations. Unfortunately, the alternative to a single superpower is not a multilateral utopia, but the anarchic nightmare of a new Dark Age (Ferguson, N., July/Aug. 2004, A World Without Power, Foreign Policy, Page 32-39).What sources tells about on the issue of US foreign policy is to what extent or magnitude of influence have taken place?The efforts on achieving a world order in the 21st cent ury is deeply complex in the history of the world where people converge in a common way of life, be it Western, Asian, Islamic. The convergence can be taken back before the development of society from its primitive communal state. The freedom or liberty of humankind, the practices and traits of people, the social order and democratization are the conformable fundamentals of a world order.Therefore, the US foreign policy is cognizant to the fundamentals and potentialities of stability in its international relations, diplomatic values amongst nations. The only way that the political will ofa foreign policy is a mighty sword and sharpened by the challenges it confronts. Bold and daring as it is intact of historically inherited dominion from the battle frontiers of France, Great Britain and Germany to the off-white Harbor, Iraq and Afghanistan. The casualties in the effects of war on terrorism can be assessed as a pragmatic result of human and technical error. The junk from the dest ruction was fragments of reality in order to regain. The critical issues on national security, economy, governance and peoples democracy progressively draws conscience and awareness among leaders of nations. The consensus on US foreign policy in developing countries has much gaunt critical importance to minimize the adversity in political, economic aspects and human suffering. That is for allied governments to make use the influence of foreign policy in the objective condition of its governance, mandate and the sovereign will of the people.REFERENCESExcerpt speech of US president George W. Bush, October 10th 2007The Uruguay Round, General Agreement on Tariff and Trade, World Trade Organization (WTO)Policymakers and the Intelligence Community Supporting Us Foreign Policy in the Post-9/11 World, Richard N. Haas, CIA posted documentCommission on Human Rights, Philippines, September 2007Published Article, US National Security Strategy of 2007