Emperial Rome vs Han Essay

The Classical Period was a time where large, land-based empires were developed. The chairing of these empires were met with many questions on how to break their territories. While twain the Han empire and gallant Rome exercised political control over their empires through government structure, they differed in their organization of bureaucrats and their trustingness on slavery. Both the Han and purple Rome exercised political control through similar government structure. The Han emperor, who was believed to be the Mandate of paradise, had absolute power over all of his people.They relied intemperately on their develop bureaucrats, the Shi, to carry out lawful duties. This reliance was supported by Confucian ways and stabilized the empire. Imperial Rome also practiced having a singular ruler to control the whole. The Roman emperor also was believed to wee-wee power over the citizens of Rome. The Romans also had their own class of bureaucrats who were valued highly. This ten der stratification unified Rome as a country. Both Han and Imperial Rome relied on social hierarchy to religious service with exercising political control over their empires.They practiced this structure because it unified power in the state and lessened the amount of chaos. The Han relied on their bureaucratic class of accomplished officials to exercise political control whereas in Rome bureaucracy was accustomed as a reward to returned war heroes. The Hans bureaucrats, the Shi, were trained in the Confucian ways. This made the officials more reliable and prone to do the adept thing. The Shi were also taught to embody the law and enforce it in the state. This method of lead by example helped citizens strive to do their best.If the citizens were all hoping to be a emend man, the society as a whole would be a better place. The Hans bureaucrats were ran more on a basis of institutionalize in their behavior than the Romans. This method of trust in the bureaucrats was heavily supp orted by the Confucian teachings and their training in becoming better men. In Imperial Rome, bureaucracy was condition to returned warriors. Rome hoped that by honor good soldiers there would be more desire to go employment in a war and succeed.These bureaucrats enforced the laws rather than embodying them. They werent reliable, yet were forceful enough to get the job done by employ fear to make the citizens behave and do as the laws said. The bureaucracy was given to the returned war heroes as a reward for their accomplishments in battles. This gave soldiers more desire to fight and do well in wars so that when they returned they would be reward for their accomplishments. The Han relied more on trust to carry out their political control than Imperial Rome did.The Hans trained their bureaucrats to make them more trustworthy and crimp to their ruler. However, Rome used their successful soldiers because they fought in many wars they needed demand for their soldiers to go be su ccessful and to fight bravely and honorably. While both civilizations had slaves, Han chinaware didnt rely greatly on their slaves however in Imperial Rome slaves were a critical and indispensable part of the society. In Chinese societies slaves were used mostly for at home chores such as cooking, cleaning, or going shopping.Even without slaves performing these domestic tasks, the Han couldve survived. Also, slaves in china were treated less harshly than those in Rome. The slaves in China were allowed to hold certain tasks that were not included in their contract when they first write to their owner without fearing a severe beating. Lastly, China had an overall more delicate view on their slaves. The owners in Han were not as strict or cruel. However in Imperial Rome, slaves were mostly captured war prisoners who were being punished.This conduct to harsh punishment of the slaves to make sure they behaved and did as told. Slaves began doing a legal age of the physical labor i n Imperial Rome which made them an summation to the Roman society. If Rome were to lose their slaves, the economy would crumble and the empire would betide. Finally, about Roman slaves were given high titles, such as lawyers or doctors. So to lose these slaves would be to lost tons of profit. Both societies used slaves, notwithstanding Imperial Rome was much more reliant on their slaves than Han China was.The Hans didnt rely on slaves much because they knew that they werent reliable and if they unploughed a strong hold on them they would rebel and cause the fall of the empire. However, Rome used the method of scaring their slaves into doing the right thing. If the slaves feared a brutal beating they would be sure to make the right decisions and follow directions. In both Han China and Imperial Rome government structure was used to help exercise political control, however they differed on their organization of bureaucracy and their reliance on slavery.