Sunday, December 23, 2018
'The Rise of the Modern American Presidency\r'
'To begin, an narrative that more atomic number 18 sure to hark back and relate to is presented: as the united States build itself in a state of war, the likes of which it had never seen before, the chairwoman found himself at a articulation of policy, causation and the consequences of his actions, for whatever course he took, there would be semi goernmental f each(prenominal) issue. each in all of his advisors had aboutthing to offer, and of course, his critics and policy-making enemies all stood ready to line up his d sustainfall should he falter in his resolve or fail in his judgment.Ultimately, com/unit-3-our-government- nowadays-the-legislative-and-executive-branches/>the hot seat took full advantage of his male monarchs- given and implied- and set forth with his course of action, lament qualified off a firestorm of disputes over the take aim of advocate he actually possesses, how often input much(prenominal) governmental bodies as the US sexual congr ess has in multiplication of death chairial posturing, and the like. The scenario presented sounds as if it could eat been disunite from the incumbent headlines, as president George W.Bush is engulfed in controversy and opposition for his process of index number in the midst of the red-brick war on terrorism, tho a nimble glance backward into the annals of in constituent shows that this same scenario, albeit with some differences in thoughtfulness here and there, could take to Abraham Lincoln during the well-bred War, Franklin D. Roosevelt during World War II, and certainly could apply to whatever number of early(a) presidents.The allude to be made is that the increase and exercise of presidential motive is one of the well-nigh critical routines and masterminds of contention in American politics. Even in light of old (and present) poor decision making on the part of American death chairs, and the scandals that produce rocked the government to its core in the past, every distinction is that presidential indicant will solely continue to grow as the twenty-first century unfolds and the complexity of the American political system grows (Shafritz, Weinberg).In this research, the different conceptions of the proper design of the death chair in the American political system will be presented and discussed, with an last-ditch goal of tracing the rise of the modern government activity, when/why the President became so reigning, why this power has operated, and whether or not the detective favors and alternative, as well as the advantages/disadvantages of such hefty leadership. The Rise of the Modern American Presidency As this paper began, an tale was presented that in fact applies to every whiles of presidential leadership in America.The earth of such power begs the first enquire of when this power first began to emerge. By design, the organisation of the United States was constitutionally intended to be of course an executive leadership eccentric that was ultimately independent of the Congress that was besides originated by the same temperamental mandates (Lowi, et al). Therefore, from the jump of the US itself, the President was placed in the position whereby he would have call forth the powers of the government activity if he were to be able to gain/sustain any test of assertive power during his years as chief executive.Throughout American history, there have been examples of passive and aggressive, weak and good presidents, all because of their ability-or lack of ability- to successfully establish a power base within their tribunal. This power base can be pull together through a variety of means, such as the assembly of a virile cabinet of advisors who in themselves possess the endurance and connections to found their boss a more(prenominal) formidable chief executive, through belongings the favor of Congress, such as when Congress is controlled by the political company of the presiden t in question, or through his own cunning, skills or outright deception.Whatever the case whitethorn be the net effect over the past two centuries plus has been that the presidency has risen to a pinnacle of alter degrees of power, depending upon the person holding the authority. When/Why the American President Gained Such force play The power that the President has the option of exercising or relaxing, according to most stemmas, has its modern root in a specific administration and period of American history.The President was FD Roosevelt, and the time was immediately upon his assumption of office in 1932, through World War II, and up to the time of Rooseveltââ¬â¢s death in office in 1945 (Shafritz, Weinberg). In fact, the causality that Roosevelt set with his administration seemed, in retrospect, to have taken the presidency to a bargon-assed level of modern power. There be a few assertable reasons for this. hotshot reason that is frequently cited by numerous historian s is the dawn of the development of the nuclear weapon- often called the dawn of the Atomic Age.With the existence of technology that could literally drop off the planet in a matter of moments put forth an interesting dynamic for the political embellish of America- first, although it was a highly guarded mystery story at the time, prior to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan in 1945, the corridors of American presidential power doubtlessly came to the realization that they not scarce had an frightening responsibility to wield nuclear weapons in a careful manner, but alike that there were likely other powerful nations, such as the USSR, who also held in their possession nuclear weapons that could likewise destroy the planet as we know it.Therefore, the American President became not alone in a sense the judge, jury and executioner for the nation and the rest of the world, but also a sort of protector for all of the pink of my Johnful people of the world. From that p oint forward, foreign relations, technology and the deterioration of the state of peace in the world has galvanized the power of the American President.Why the Power Endures The endurance of the power of the President of the United States, it now appears, is essential to endure because of the dangers that lurk in the nations of the world, making it unavoidable for the American President to be a sort of watchdog for the entire planet. Additionally, there are other, more transparent but nonetheless significant reasons why presidential power endures.Whether anyone would care to admit it or not, the President of the United States is in many cases kept as a powerful individual due to the fact that the major(ip) political parties of America use the presidency as a central source of influence and clout for their party when a President from their particular party holds the office; therefore, it is of mutual benefit for the President and his party to work to support each other, and a key i ngredient that is needed to ground the coalition work is the gathering and holding of power.Elected officials likewise will help to make the President more powerful in exchange for his support in their political activities and aspirations. Literally, it must also be hold that the President of the United States is explicitly given certain powers by the US Constitution (Lowi, et al). Some of these-what are known as expressed powers- are somewhat automatic pistol for the President. Others- known as delegated powers-many times study the consultation of Congress and others in say to be exercised.This being said, however, one only needs to look at todayââ¬â¢s headlines to find countless examples where the current President has overstepped the boundaries of what is traditionally permitted on the Presidentââ¬â¢s own initiative. Many championship that this is literally illegal-others are scarce outraged- some take both stances. Therefore, what we see is that the President of t he United States has acquired some powers, has some powers that are constitutionally built-in, and has other powers that have simply been grabbed without permission.Pros/Cons of Presidential Power Presidential power has its advantages and disadvantages- in many cases, the difference amidst the two lies in political standstill and/or personal opinion. On the confirmative side, few would argue that a President with the ability to defend the nation successfully from enemies, keep the economy going strong, and tolerate for the welfare of the people through the skill of power would be an unfavorable scenario.On the other hand, the ââ¬Å"consââ¬Â of presidential power include possible abuses of that power, unfavorable consequences of the wielding of that power, etc. In any case, there will never be a perfect balance of presidential power, but perhaps there are ways to keep the power in check while still belongings the President as a strong leader for the good of the people. Rese archerââ¬â¢s ViewsThe result of this research, in the mind of the detective, has been to move into to the realization that absolute presidential power is not a favorable lieu, nor is the situation of a weak President who has to look permission and motivation to accomplish anything. Therefore, the researcher herein puts forth an opinion that the issue of the appropriate level of presidential power cannot be answered with a political debate, election or document.It can, however, be balanced with carriage of politically active citizens who speak out when the president oversteps his boundaries of authority, works to improve the nation, and perpetually holds the President to a high stock(a) of accountability and responsible use of power. Then, and only then, can presidential power be correctly held and utilized. Conclusion The President of the United States, even centuries after the foundation of America, remains an enigmatic contradiction- he needs to be powerful, yet that p ower needs to be regulated and monitored.Therefore, in closing, let this point be understood- blind faith in any leaders will necessarily create chaos. As such, every American has the responsibility to express their opinions, be heard, and weigh to keep the presidency what it was intended to be- the voice of the people. Works Cited Lowi, Ginsberg, Shepsle (2005). American Government: Power and Purpose. 9th ed. New York: WW Norton and Company. Shafritz, Weinberg (2005). Classics in American Literature. third ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Wadsworth.\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment