Problem Formulation and Identification Process Essay

It doesnt matter which side of the fence you get off on neartimes. What matters more or less is getting off. You lav non make progress without do closes (Jim Rohn). In the corporate world, leadership ar faced with closes that preserve make or break the organizations they represent. some(a)(prenominal) methods, consensus, brainstorm, systematic, and democratic be commitd in the decision do act. This piece will investigate the decision- qualification appendagees about prevalent in all(prenominal) ag assort members organization, compare and contrast them, and will show the most favorable aspect of each style.ConsensusThe name of my company is Envicor. Envicor is a plastics mold company that manufactures anything that can be make of plastic. This author was recently engage as the national sales manager to oversee Envicors newest convergence line, sporting goods equipment. This authors job is to promote the sale of man-portable pitching mounds to a broad range of cu stomers. When it fill outs to decision do, Envicor uses the consensus method.Consensus is a surgical operation victimisation group decision reservation. The in countersink and ideas of all participants are ga in that locationd and synthesized to arrive at a final decision acceptable to all. through and through consensus, the company is not only turn overing(a) to achieve better solutions, scarcely also to promote the growth of community and trust.Consensus takes more time, as umpteen an(prenominal) resources are investigated before a decision is made. Team members suffer committed to the decision through consensus. The consensus method gives everyone experience with new attendes of interaction and mesh resolution. For consensus to be a positive experience, the group should have 1) common values, 2) some skill in group process and conflict resolution, or a commitment to let these be facilitated,3) commitment and responsibility to the group by its members, and 4) suffic ient time for everyone to participate in the process (C.D.T. 2009).The goal of Envicor is to cover our product line to as many customers as possible. After fashioning contact with a catalog company, a meeting is called in night club to discuss the pros and cons of including our product in the catalog. In the meetings, each person gets a chance to give his or her opinion. Once everyone has spoken, a decision is made. By using the consensus method, the group is able to come together and make a decision based on each persons opinion.Advantages and dis utilitys constitute when using the consensus method of decision making.. Some ex adenosine monophosphateles areStrengthsEncourages cooperation instead of contestGarners trust and confidence everyone is involved in the final decisionEveryone agrees to the final decision no matter whether a mass, minority, or lone voiceWeaknesses omit of experience may lead to inefficient use of the method lack of control in meetings, conversation goes off topicNo ownership when decision is not correct or no consensus made (Notes on Consensus-Decision Making).Consensus seems to work well for smaller companies because it go forths them to actually talk out their decisions and come together. Bigger companies might struggle with this type of decision making process because there might be too many employees and it could waste a lot of time.BrainstormingIn the brainstorming model, all employees use palliate thinking to create ideas that will later be used as part of the projects process. Brainstorming is useful because it allows all employees, some with extensive experience, to give their input. All members contri barelyions allow them to own their role in spite of appearance the group and therefore, believe they have been a larger part of greater good.Like other decision making processes, brainstorming has advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is that all decisions are reached by consensus of the entire group. The larg er the group is in a brainstorming session, the better the results will be. Everyone works from his or her strengths, weaknesses, experience, and discipline to find the best results for the project.Next, by making the decision a group project, everyone has a chance to participate in the decision making process. They are able to voice their objections and give alternative suggestions. This open forum allows ideas to melt freely, and sound decisions are made quickly.A disadvantage of brainstorming is akin(predicate) to one of its advantages. With more than two or three employees making a decision, the result can become a point of contention and a fight for power within the group. The more people involved in the process, the greater the propensity for debate, creating the possibility of a stalemate.Another disadvantage of brainstorming is something called group think. This occurs when one member of a group makes a statement, and the others act on along. Nothing is accomplished because only one person is making the decision with no alternate suggestions. An open dialogue does not exist therefore, solutions to problems are not properly explored.SystematicThe systematic glide path to decision-making is rational and analytical. ( pithy Handbook of homoagement) This approach employs existing data, and the goal of the decision is the focus of the steps taken to put the decision together. This authors organization uses the systematic approach for making most decisions. A strength of using the systematic approach is that teaching used to reach the final decision is based on genuine data. The goal has been intelligibly identified the objective(s) have been defined the impact of not addressing the issue has been established. A weakness of systematic decision making, an example of which will be expound in the following paragraphs, is that the decision can become stalled in the process. Additionally, regardless of how much research is done, if all principal sta keholders are not engaged in the process, a negative outcome is possible.several(prenominal) age ago this authors company developed a product that was designed to align with current imaging procedures. The equipment is a dual- boss injector for use in CT scan. The purpose of the dual-head is to provide Radiologists with the capability of using not only contrast media for the CT exams, that also saline. Benefits of having the saline choice developed as the clinical team became more familiar with the system, but initially the avail team was concerned about damage occurring to the injector head if a saline syringe was not used.At that time, without consulting other stakeholders, the service and engineering teams went to work on a solution that would prevent this issue.Several years later, as the clinical team was successfully promoting saline usage, the engineering division began shipping a cap for the saline side of the injector. Yes, the issue had been clearly identified, the objective for the project was defined, and the impact of not addressing the issue had been determined. However, because all stakeholders in the decision were not involved, and because the process took so long, the decision and resulting action became a very expensive mistake.DemocraticIn this participative form of the decision making process the superior(s) gives complete ownership of the decision to the subordinates (Sager 1999). The democratic decision making process allows for the employees (stakeholders) to have ownership of the decisions that are made. The majority balloting wins, which can lead to fast and effective decisions concerning the stakeholders. In this decision making process the adage regarding having strength in numbers reigns true.A drawback to the democratic process can be that no one person takes responsibility for the decision if something goes wrong. It may be unexpressed to pinpoint how the decision came to much(prenominal) a conclusion if it does not wor k out for the benefit for the stakeholders. In using the example of the Health Insurance Accountability and Portability Act (HIPPA) of 1996, a vote for change by a group of individuals affected by the counseling health records were handled was applauded, then when implemented, the act became more a hindrance than a solution to a problem.In the vast health systems used there was a need to implement a privacy feature to hold dear patients information, so the HIPPA regulations were signed into law in 1996. HIPPA was implemented by a democratic decision making process and became popular with health organizations such as Medicare and well known health insurance companies. Later HIPPAs biggest fans became its biggest objectors because the law made it impossible for anyone to get health information on the patient, including the parent(s) or guardians of minor children and the elderly, unless there was a form signed by the patient, the legal guardian, or POA. HIPPA soon became more fr ustrating than helpful, and the majority who voted for its carrying out became the majority opposing it. So in implementing the democratic decision making process for the good of the people to whom the power is given, it must be made known that with great power comes great responsibility (Uncle Ben, Spider Man Pt1).Contrast and ComparisonProblems and issues are generally inevitable when people are working together. Each individual decision making process can allow for better management of those situations for building a better organization. This does not opine there will be an absence of issues, but whether or not the team resolves the problem effectively. Each decision making process described above demonstrates to the reader the importance of adhering to a process that will work for each organization. The consensus method shows how the power of agreement can lead to a good decision. However, this method can be time consuming and teamwork plays a major role.Brainstorming will all ow for creativity and open ideas, but can also cause conflicts and debates among the group members due to so many independent ideas being presented. In the systematic approach to decision making organization is critical. This process bases decisions on factual information. The systematic process can be costly if all members are not involved in the final decision. Democratic decisions are made based on majority input. The stakeholders are in total control of the decision making process. brisk and effective decisions can be made however, problems can occur because not everyone who can vote will vote. Then if a decision has a negative impact on the group it can be hard to identify the owner of the problem.The authors of this paper have investigated four types of decision making, consensus, brainstorming, systematic, and democratic. Advantages and disadvantages of each type have been presented, and finally, all were compared and contrasted with each other.ReferencesConsensus Decision M aking. Aids alignment to Unleash Power. Retrieved May 19, 2009. http//www.actupny.org/documents/CDdocuments/Consensus.htmlNotes on Consensus-Decision Making. Retrieved May 19, 2009. www.vernalproject.org/papers/process/ConsensNotes.pdfScott, Jonathan T. 2009, Concise Handbook of Management A Practitioners ApproachChapter 17 managerial Decision Making and Problem Solving, p131- 138retrieved 5/19/09 from http//web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=9&hid=106&sid=f7f74d3b-190b-4f87-ae2e-438809c65b35%40sessionmgr109McConnell, C. R. (2006). Umikers Management Skills for the New Health Care Supervisor.Ch 25 pp.337-345.Sager, K.L., & Gastil, J.,(1999). Reaching consensus on consensus Communication Quarterly. 47(1), 67-79.