hould Kroger Pay Now For What Ralphs’ Employee Did Then? Essay

CASE 1. Should Kroger Pay Now For What Ralphs Employee Did Then? scruple 1 Assuming that the computer storage and district managers of Ralphs received complaints about Misioleks behavior starting in 1985, alone that these complaints did non reach Ralphs render in Compton, do you believe that the judge is right in holding that the friendship as a whole should not be held responsible for his carry throughs? Should the company be held responsible for policies that prevent complaints from reaching headquarters?Ralphs Grocery Co. should be held responsible be example Ralphs management did not facilitate feedback, complaints from employee to headquarter. thither was also no control mechanism on Ralphs Grocery Co. The or so important thing that should be under air traveld is In April 1996 several women already complained to Ralphs management but the company did not take any pull through to discipline Misiolek. Misiolek was not removed from his state of affairs as store manager, bu t instead moved the complaining women to other stores. brain 2 What sorting of penalty do you believe would be appropriate for Ralphs? In your view, was the $33.3 cardinal penalty excessive? Explain.The penalty should be compensatory and punitive damages. It would be such(prenominal) a corking idea based on compensatory justice principal. The $33.3 meg penalty is excessive depending on how such(prenominal) the cost to rehabilitate the victims and how much the victims were aggrieved. I conclude that $33.3 million penalty was excessive because the psychological entirelyude for some employees was not seriously same with. Except for those who was grabbed, touched, patted, hugged, touched their breasts which was elbow room more offensive should be give much more than renewal cost penalty. Question 3 Should Kroger have to pay for events that happened before it took oer the chain of supermarkets?Ethically Kroger should not pay at all. But very it depends on the acquisition contrac t between Kroger with Fred Meyer and Fred Meyer withRalphs. Question 4 many an(prenominal) states (but not California) adopt federal rules that place a crown of $300,000 on punitive damages in harassment cases. Is such a cap a good idea from an ethical point of view? Explain.In consideration same with question number two, so it is not good idea for flattening penalty. It should meet the cost to rehabilitate the victims and how much the victims were aggrieved. Jail punishment should be considered.Question 5 What can a company do to make sure that a situation like Misioleks does not occur? Why do you think Ralphs allowed Misiolek to continue managing stores?A policy that should be exist be written with zero-tolerance policy prohibiting versed harassment, conduct some control mechanism by facilitating employee feedback, online complain media, supervisory for manager, All complaints must thoroughly investigated. Ralphs allowed Misiolek to continue managing store because of his capa bility to chance on profits at the stores that he manage and of achieving excellent bottom line figures at those stores.CASE 2. Wal-Marts WomenQuestion 1 What financial encounter do you think the honorsuit could potentially have on Wal-Mart?If the law suit was successful the company would have to pay all the payment amount which was around 86 million dollars to its entire 1.6 million pistillate employees .Which in short would be a big blow to the companys financials, and also with the deteriorating image caused by the issue they might perchance lose out on an considerable amount of customers leading to tho financial implications. It would also result in higher prices in the store because the company would gauge to make up for all the loss incurred cause of the particular suit. Question 2 What are the major moral complaints of the females suing Wal-Mart? Do you believe these moral complaints are justified? Why?The major complaints launched by the women were that the company ( wal-mart)discriminated against female employees in forward motions pay, management training and job assignments. The women declared that publicitys in wal-mart were biased towards men, where men were promoted much faster and at a much frequent rate then women. They also stated that at that place was a pay gap between men and women where two nation of different sexual activity on the same positions were paid differently and women were frequently paid fairly lower than the men. I think feel the complaints are valid.If you are in a job and you see other coworkers get hired whom are less qualified than you are then I think that the complaints are valid. If more than one complaint is being make about the company then an investigation is warranted. The complaints are justified if you employ for a position or inquire about a position and the company doesnt give you an opportunity but then procedure around and hire a male whom is less qualified than you are. Thats reason to make a c oncrete decision and go forward. I would have done the exact same thing. Question 3 What factors do you think might account for the discrepancies the Drogin report uncovered?1) wrong cognition of higher level employees towards females. 2) Subjective analysis of performance3) Biased promotion policies4)Lack of clearly stated promotion criteria and wage structure. Question 4 What, if anything, do you think Wal-Mart should do to separate these discrepancies? Should the company institute an affirmative action promotion program for female employees? If so, what should this program look like?To correct the above issues wal-mart should try and place an monitoring system which would monitor the promotion procedure and the ratio in which male and female employees are promoted, try and specify the promotion criteria and wage structures and make its even for all employees regardless of their gender so as to avoid situations like this in the future. Strict action and measures should be taken against people encouraging gender discrimination in the company i.e the managers as stated in the case. Question 5 Do you think the women deserve to win their lawsuit?